Skip to main content
· 12/16/1977

Humboldt Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert L. Curtis and Southern Forwarding Co., Intervenors

Citations

  • 567 F.2d 1134
  • 186 U.S. App. D.C. 141
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Our present difficulty is that the Commission has failed to state its reasons for reaching the result it considered correct.\
  • “Our present difficulty is that the Commission has failed to state its reasons for reaching the result it considered correct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, MacKinnon, Markey, Patent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.