Skip to main content
· 3/23/1964

Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Waggonner

Citations

  • 376 U.S. 369
  • 84 S. Ct. 857
  • 11 L. Ed. 2d 782
  • 1964 U.S. LEXIS 2168
  • 20 Oil & Gas Rep. 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in action initiated by individual corporation, that state has no jurisdiction to levy tax on property owned by private corporation located on federal military base, which the federal government acquired by donation from the state
  • “A contractual requirement ... standing alone, cannot be read as manifesting a purpose of the Government to abandon exclusive jurisdiction” over a federal enclave.
  • “It is the established rule that ... refusal to accept may be proved by evidence.”
  • \It is the established rule that . . . refusal to accept may be proved by evidence.\
  • cession of jurisdiction will not revert to the state merely because some parts of a parcel are no longer used in the manner the state intended
  • “It is the established rule that . . . refusal to accept may be proved by evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.