Skip to main content
· 7/26/1963

Humble Oil & Refining Company and Cargo Carriers, Inc. v. Bell Marine Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 321 F.2d 53
  • 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4518
  • 1964 A.M.C. 315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analogizing Rule 9(F)’s predecessor, Admiralty Rule 54, to the transfer analysis under § 1404(a)
  • analogizing Rule F(9)’s predecessor, Admiralty Rule 54, to the transfer analysis under § 1404(a)
  • analogizing Rule F(9)’s predecessor, Admiralty Rule 54, to the transfer analysis under § 1404(a)
  • analogizing Rule 9(F)’s predecessor, Admiralty Rule 54, to the transfer analysis under § 1404(a)
  • “But, of course, he who seeks the transfer must show good cause.” (emphasis added)
  • “But, of course, he who seeks the transfer must show good cause.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutcheson, Gewin, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.