· 7/26/1963
Humble Oil & Refining Company and Cargo Carriers, Inc. v. Bell Marine Service, Inc.
Citations
- 321 F.2d 53
- 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4518
- 1964 A.M.C. 315
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analogizing Rule 9(F)’s predecessor, Admiralty Rule 54, to the transfer analysis under § 1404(a)
- analogizing Rule F(9)’s predecessor, Admiralty Rule 54, to the transfer analysis under § 1404(a)
- analogizing Rule F(9)’s predecessor, Admiralty Rule 54, to the transfer analysis under § 1404(a)
- analogizing Rule 9(F)’s predecessor, Admiralty Rule 54, to the transfer analysis under § 1404(a)
- “But, of course, he who seeks the transfer must show good cause.” (emphasis added)
- “But, of course, he who seeks the transfer must show good cause.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hutcheson, Gewin, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.