Skip to main content
· 1/10/2003

Humberson v. United States Attorney's Office for District of Columbia

Citations

  • 236 F. Supp. 2d 28
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242
  • 2003 WL 102760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to recognize as a deprivation of a property interest a reassignment that precluded plaintiff from performing certain tasks that he previously performed
  • “federal courts have uniformly concluded that a change in a public employee’s duties (or, similarly, a lateral transfer) unaccompanied by a reduction in salary is not a sufficient deprivation to trigger due process obligations”
  • finding jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs constitutional due process claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.