Skip to main content
· 11/23/2010

Humane Society of the United States v. Locke

Citations

  • 626 F.3d 1040
  • 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20025
  • 71 ERC (BNA) 2025
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24047
  • 2010 WL 4723195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding NMFS did not offer a satisfactory explanation for its findings
  • holding NMFS did not offer a satisfactory explanation for its findings
  • considering an agency’s 22 prior fishery-related environmental assessments not included in the administrative record 23 because they had findings inconsistent with those included in the record
  • assuming without deciding that Chevron deference applied based on a stipulation of the parties
  • “reviewing court should not attempt itself to make up for [an agency’s deficiencies….”
  • “[T]o comply with NEPA, NMFS prepared an environmental assessment . . . . The final environmental assessment resulted in a finding of no significant impact under NEPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Paez, Fogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.