Skip to main content
· 4/26/2001

Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Citations

  • 26 P.3d 546
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2158
  • 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 710
  • 2001 WL 423052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f our interpretation of the clear language used in the statute does not correspond to the General Assembly’s intent, it is for that body, not this court, to rewrite it.”
  • “[W]e may not read a nonexistent provision into the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plank, Jones, Casebolt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.