Skip to main content
· 9/27/2023

Human Rights Defense Center v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that warrantless search can be accomplished with legitimate stop short of arrest if there is probable cause to believe contraband in vehicle
  • holding that stop of vehicle based on probable cause justifies search of every part of vehicle that may conceal object of search
  • holding that stop of vehicle based on probable cause justifies search of every part of vehicle that may conceal object of search
  • holding that a warrantless search of a vehicle is reasonable if the officer has probable cause to believe it contains contraband
  • holding that, if there is probable cause to search a movable vehicle, a warrantless search does not violate the Fourth Amendment
  • recognizing that “an immediate intrusion” “of an automobile in transit” is not unreasonable “in cases involving the transportation of contraband goods.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Carl J. Nichols

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.