Hulme v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the protection afforded by anti-retaliation legislation does not immunize the complainant from discharge for past or present inadequacies, unsatisfactory performance, or insubordination”
• relying on Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1314 (6th Cir.1989
• discussing prima facie case for statutory retaliatory discharge claim under Iowa’s civil rights law
• relying on Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1314 (6th Cir. 1989
• “The mere fact that an adverse employment decision occurs after a charge of discrimination is not, standing alone, sufficient to support a finding that the adverse employment decision was in retaliation to the claim.”
• discussing statutory retaliatory discharge claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).