Hulme v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court is guided by federal law in its analysis of civil rights cases brought under Iowa Code Ch. 601A
• deriving the three-factor test used to analyze retaliation claims from federal decisions of Title VII retaliation claims
• stating Iowa courts evaluating cases under ICRA turn to analytical framework’ used by federal courts in assessing federal law
• finding plaintiffs retaliatory discharge claim was reasonably related to plaintiffs administrative complaint for age discrimination in employment because facts showed the retaliation claim “stem[med] from [plaintiffs] original complaint”
• applying McDonnell Douglas frame work in claim brought under Iowa Civil Rights Act
• analyzing a claim that an employer discriminated against an employee in violation of the Iowa Civil Rights Act and explaining that “[o]ur court has ruled that civil rights cases brought under chapter 601A will be ‘guided by federal law’ and ‘federal cases’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).