Hullett v. Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]etermination [of] whether the language of an agreement is unambiguous may not be possible without examining the context in which the agreement arose.”
• \Pennsylvania courts apply the 'plain meaning rule' of interpretation of contracts assumes that the intent of the parties to an instrument is 'embodied in the writing . . . .'\
• interpretation of QDRO, like any other contract construction, is question of law
• “We begin our analysis by examining the language of the Agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).