Hullen v. Connolly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “Wirtz is controlling . . . for the proposition that the Department has the authority to implement a salary-level test”
• holding the Department of Labor exceeded its authority in raising the minimum salary requirement to $913 per week in the 2016 amendments, thus enjoining the amendment's implementation and instead applying the 2004 regulations
• indicating the rule “more than doubles the Department’s previous minimum salary level”
• “The Supreme Court established in Chevron a two-step standard for reviewing agency decisions.” (citing Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat’l Res. Def. Council, 467 U.S. 837, 842–43 (1984))
• relying on comparable dictionary definitions from 1933

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).