Hull v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The relationship of uncle-in-law and niece-in-law is clearly not alone sufficient to . . . implicate the incest statute, section 826.04, Florida Statutes (1995)[.8]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beam v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-23· cited 4×
• State v. Vitale
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-28
• State v. Palacio
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2023-02-21

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rawls
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-27· cited 38×
• Coleman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-26· cited 24×
• Hallberg v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-27· cited 18×
• Stricklen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-02· cited 9×
• Hallberg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-05· cited 6×
• Falco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-03· cited 1×