Skip to main content
· 7/1/1859

Hull v. Sacramento Valley Railroad

Citations

  • 14 Cal. 387

Syllabus

<p>The fact that fire was communicated from the engine of defendant’s cars to plaintiff ’s grain, with proof that this result was not probable, from the ordinary working of the engine, is, prima fade, proof of negligence, sufficient to go to the jury.</p> <p>Their finding in such case will not be reviewed by the Appellate Court.</p>

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.