· 7/1/1859
Hull v. Sacramento Valley Railroad
Citations
- 14 Cal. 387
Syllabus
<p>The fact that fire was communicated from the engine of defendant’s cars to plaintiff ’s grain, with proof that this result was not probable, from the ordinary working of the engine, is, prima fade, proof of negligence, sufficient to go to the jury.</p> <p>Their finding in such case will not be reviewed by the Appellate Court.</p>
Judges: Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.