Skip to main content

Hull v. Hull

Citations

  • 887 So. 2d 904
  • 2003 WL 22976418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a one-time use of property for the common benefit of the parties cannot be considered \regular\
  • holding that, despite the fact that the trial court did not expressly state that it considered the wife’s inheritance property when fashioning its division of property, the property division was so unsupported by the evidence as to be plainly and palpably wrong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.