Hull v. FONCK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “defendant’s misrepresentation in this case was reinforced by his representation in the contract of sale that the floor areas under any rugs or furniture were in substantially the same condition and material as the floor areas that were visible to inspection by the plaintiff”
• noting that “defendant’s misrepresentation in this case was reinforced by his representation in the contract of sale that the floor areas under any rugs or furniture were in substantially the same condition and material as the floor areas that were visible to inspection by the plaintiff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Roger B. v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-05-12

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High School
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-02-03· cited 501×
• Gibson v. Capano
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 62×
• Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 53×
• Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enterprise Park Condominium Ass'n
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-12· cited 43×
• Warman v. Delaney
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-06-13· cited 42×
• Kramer v. Petisi
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-02-26· cited 41×
• Mack v. LaValley
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-10-05· cited 39×
• Dockter v. Slowik
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-20· cited 23×
• Giametti v. Inspections, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-22· cited 22×
• Martinez v. Zovich
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-03-08· cited 14×