Skip to main content
· 6/29/2010

Hull v. FONCK

Citations

  • 999 A.2d 775
  • 122 Conn. App. 286
  • 2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “defendant’s misrepresentation in this case was reinforced by his representation in the contract of sale that the floor areas under any rugs or furniture were in substantially the same condition and material as the floor areas that were visible to inspection by the plaintiff”
  • noting that “defendant’s misrepresentation in this case was reinforced by his representation in the contract of sale that the floor areas under any rugs or furniture were in substantially the same condition and material as the floor areas that were visible to inspection by the plaintiff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gruendel, Harper, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.