Skip to main content
· 11/5/1886

Hull v. East Line & Red River R. R.

Citations

  • 66 Tex. 619
  • 2 S.W. 831
  • 1886 Tex. LEXIS 581

Syllabus

<p>1. Railway companies—Rights of passengers—Contract—Agents—A passenger on a railway train has no right to demand that he be put off at a point where there is no regular station, unles he has contracted for that privilege with some agent of the company having the real or apparent power to make such a contract.</p> <p>2. Same—Authority—The frequent exercise of power by an agent, which from its nature must have been known to the principal, may be regarded by persons dealing with the agent as sufficient evidence of the real existence of the power which the agent assumes to exercise. See opinion. (Authorities cited.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • order modifying visitation schedule while dissolution judgment was pending on appeal rendered appeal from judgment moot and mandated dismissal of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stayton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.