Hull v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• order dismissing subparagraphs was not a final and appealable order despite the Rule 304(a) finding by the trial court
• where complaint alleged several different negligent acts and omissions but advanced only one theory of recovery, namely, negligence, the action only involved a single claim
• when a single claim is stated by multiple subparagraphs, an appeal cannot be taken until the trial court enters a final order on all of the subparagraphs
• when a single claim is stated by multiple subparagraphs, an appeal cannot be taken until the trial court enters a final order on all of the subparagraphs
• a final order is one that “either terminates the litigation between the parties on the merits or disposes of the rights of the parties, either on the entire controversy or a separate branch thereof’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).