Skip to main content
· 11/21/1890

Huling v. Abbott

Citations

  • 86 Cal. 423
  • 25 P. 4
  • 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1045

Syllabus

<p>Certificate of Purchase — Assignment—Notice of Unrecorded Mortgage — Reconveyance from Bona Fide Purchaser—Patent.—An assignee of a certificate of purchase of state lands, who took with actual notice of an unrecorded mortgage by his assignor, remains affected as a purchaser with notice of the mortgage, and is not protected by the fact that he assigned his title to a bona fide, purchaser for value without notice of the mortgage, who reconveyed the lands to him, after obtaining a state patent therefor; and the mortgage may be enforced against a subsequent grantee of such assignee, who took a conveyance after record of the mortgage, and who does not appear to have paid any money on his purchase.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • an appellate court will not interfere with a custody decision made by the trial court unless there is “a clear abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.