Hulett Foster v. Glynn Booher, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he Supreme Court abandoned this strict definition of ‘in custody’ in the context of consecutive sentences ”
• describing petitioner as serving a fifteen-year sentence imposed by a state court
• observing that the custody requirement “is jurisdictional”
• observing that the custody requirement “is jurisdictional”
• “Any attempt to distinguish Garlotte on its facts ignores the language in Garlotte, which sets out a clear and broad rule that we must ‘view consecutive sentences in the aggregate, not as discrete segments.’” (quoting Garlotte, 515 U.S. at 47)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).