Skip to main content
· 9/17/2008

Hukill v. Oklahoma Native American Domestic Violence Coalition

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 794
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19705
  • 104 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 641
  • 2008 WL 4226524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that service by mail that is accepted by an unauthorized person does not substantially comply with the statute and is invalid
  • providing that “if the plaintiff shows good cause of the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period”
  • finding service to be invalid and not in substantial compliance with 12 O.S. § 2004(C)(2) when plaintiff failed to obtain restricted delivery to an authorized person.
  • stating the court must determine it has personal jurisdiction over the defendant before it may enter a default judgment
  • “[A] default judgment in a civil case is void if there is no personal jurisdiction over the defendant.”
  • a default judgment entered without proper service of process is void for lack of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes, Porfilio, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.