Skip to main content
· 12/31/1992

Huisenga v. Opus Corp.

Citations

  • 494 N.W.2d 469
  • 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 457
  • 1992 Minn. LEXIS 366
  • 1992 WL 389168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using Title VII case law to interpret the meaning of “bona fide occupational qualification” under the MHRA
  • employer cannot rely on false representation defense when application asks questions that violate provisions of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. § 363.01 et seq., that deem certain pre-offer inquiries about an employee’s disabilities to be unfair employment practices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tomljanovich, Coyne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.