· 12/31/1992
Huisenga v. Opus Corp.
Citations
- 494 N.W.2d 469
- 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 457
- 1992 Minn. LEXIS 366
- 1992 WL 389168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- using Title VII case law to interpret the meaning of “bona fide occupational qualification” under the MHRA
- employer cannot rely on false representation defense when application asks questions that violate provisions of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. § 363.01 et seq., that deem certain pre-offer inquiries about an employee’s disabilities to be unfair employment practices
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tomljanovich, Coyne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.