Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 9/4/2019

Hui Mu v. William Barr

Citations

  • 936 F.3d 929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an immigration judge may consider the inconvenience to the court and the number of continuances previously granted
  • recognizing that arguments not raised in the opening brief are deemed forfeited
  • explaining that a petitioner waived any challenge to an issue she did not raise in her opening brief
  • noting that an issue not raised in the opening brief is deemed waived
  • noting that issues not addressed in the opening brief are deemed waived
  • excusing the agency’s failure to expressly address the “good cause” factors listed in Ahmed where the agency’s reasoning was otherwise adequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.