Skip to main content
· 2/15/1991

Hugo v. OLIVERA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. NESTLE PUERTO RICO, INC., Et Al., Defendants, Appellees

Citations

  • 922 F.2d 43
  • 1990 WL 211623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in this circuit a plaintiff must adduce additional evidence of discrimination
  • setting out a prima facie case for termination in which the last element is that the plaintiff “was replaced by someone with qualifications similar to his own, thus showing a continued need by the employer for the same services and skills”
  • employer mentioned that poor performance by some of plaintiffs subordinates was due to age
  • summarizing Supreme Court employment discrimination doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Bownes, Woodlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.