Skip to main content
· 8/24/2004

Hugo Lopez-Alvarado Maria Trinidad Lizardo De Lopez Hugo Giovani Lopez-Lizardo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Citations

  • 381 F.3d 847
  • 2004 WL 1879303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “IJ’s demand for documentary evidence was unreasonable in light of petitioner’s circumstances” as someone who “stayed home and did not work”
  • finding that petitioners had met their burden where nothing contradicted the detailed documentary and testimonial evidence presented by petitioners
  • finding that petitioners had met their burden where the detailed documentary and testimonial evidence presented by petitioners was consistent
  • finding that petitioners had met their burden where the detailed documentary and testimonial evidence presented by petitioners was consistent
  • noting that “the corroborating evidence for Mr. Lopez’s continuous presence is particularly strong [and] powerful in the aggregate”
  • holding substantial evidence did not support denial of cancellation of removal application where alien’s credible testimony regarding physical presence was rejected due to her failure to provide corroborating evidence.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, McKeown, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.