Hugo Hernandez-Diaz v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, at the time of Armstead’s trial in 2009, CSI-effect voir dire was permissible, and arguably even “favored,” under Maryland law
• noting that the missing scientific evidence would have been cumulative to the evidence presented and was not critical to the State in meeting its burden of proof to convict Armstead

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).