Hughlett v. Romer-Sensky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that certain provisions of Title IV-D did not “contain the individually focused, rights-creating language necessary to confer an individual right” or private cause of action
• resolving whether a statute created a private cause of action for untimely distribution of state benefits
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that, read together, § 657(a)(3) and § 654b(c)(1) create private right
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that, read together, § 657(a)(3) and § 654b(c)(1) create private right
• holding 42 U.S.C. §§ 657(a) and 654b(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).