Hughes v. Veal
Citations
- 84 Kan. 534
- 114 P. 1081
- 1911 Kan. LEXIS 365
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Highways — Acceptance of Congressional Grant. The congressional grant of a right of way for the construction of highways over public lands may be accepted by the acts of the public authorities or by the public itself, or by the concurrent action of both.</p> <p>2. - Same. Where the officers of the county undertake to establish a highway, and the proceedings taken are insufficient to meet all the requirements prescribed by the statutes of the state for establishing highways, and where such officers cause the highway to be surveyed and located over public lands, and the public itself adopts the action of the officers and travels over and uses the road as a highway, the com- ■ bined acts of the officers and the public are sufficient to constitute an acceptance of the congressional grant.</p> <p>S. -Existence — Proof., The evidence in the case examined and held to be sufficient to support the decision that a highway exists over appellant’s land.</p>
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementTenth Circuit· 2005-10-12· cited 154×
- Hatch Bros. v. BlackWyoming Supreme Court· 1917-06-11· cited 23×
- Moulton v. IrishMontana Supreme Court· 1923-06-15· cited 19×
- Our Lady of the Rockies, Inc. v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court· 2008-04-01· cited 16×
- United States v. PrudenTenth Circuit· 1949-01-24· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Veale v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-02-10· cited 5×
- So. Utah Wilderness v. BLMTenth Circuit· 2005-09-08
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1889-12-28· cited 64×
- Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-08-27· cited 52×
- Smith v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court· 1899-10-10· cited 46×
- McRose v. BottyerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-10-12· cited 37×
- Wallowa County v. WadeOregon Supreme Court· 1903-06-22· cited 23×
- Tholl v. KolesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-12-06· cited 22×
- Molyneux v. GrimesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-11-07· cited 6×
- Woodman v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-11-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.