Skip to main content

Hughes v. State

Citations

  • 481 N.E.2d 135
  • 1985 Ind. App. LEXIS 2665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that defendant was driving in proper lane, was not weaving, had no speech problems, satisfactorily performed dexterity tests, passed field sobriety tests, and other than speeding exhibited no aberrant driving
  • providing that the factfinders could infer impairment from the defendants’ acts of driving well above the posted speed limit at night and dusk, respectively, especially when coupled with other visible signs of the defendants’ intoxication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neal, Ratliff, Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.