Missouri Court of Appeals· 8/27/2007
Hughes v. State
Citations
- 232 S.W.3d 596
- 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1174
- 2007 WL 2410844
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting non-objection to instructions can be strategic in nature where objection would conflict with theory of the defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daniel E. Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Joos v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-02-11· cited 10×
- Melillo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-10-01· cited 10×
- Childress v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-03-27· cited 7×
- Jennings v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-04-16· cited 3×
- Crowder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-07-14· cited 1×
- KEIGHTLEY v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-08-12· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Holman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-09-03· cited 28×
- Hubbard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-08-01· cited 22×
- Sams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-11-24· cited 20×
- State v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-09-18· cited 14×
- Barnum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-08-14· cited 12×
- Harp v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-01-05· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.