Skip to main content
· 11/23/1982

Hughes v. Schaefer

Citations

  • 452 A.2d 428
  • 294 Md. 653
  • 1982 Md. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that the BOE could properly contract for professional services to obtain assistance to conduct a loan program
  • permitting the BOE to approve only those proposals that had received favorable recommendations from the trustees and, therefore, effectively giving the trustees veto power over the BOE
  • under municipal development loan program, “City financing of construction to be let by the borrower, and not by the City, on the borrower’s own land and for the borrower’s own use is not a ‘public work’ ” requiring public bidding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky, Couch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.