· 8/20/2003
Hughes v. Misar
Citations
- 76 P.3d 111
- 189 Or. App. 258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding in similar circumstances that “the objective meaning of the parties’ action was that the agreed terms were binding immediately”
- describing a similar situation as implying that a prior agreement was binding
- “Whether [a contract is] express or implied in fact, under certain circumstances, a court may add or supply an omitted essential term.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.