Skip to main content
· 8/20/2003

Hughes v. Misar

Citations

  • 76 P.3d 111
  • 189 Or. App. 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding in similar circumstances that “the objective meaning of the parties’ action was that the agreed terms were binding immediately”
  • describing a similar situation as implying that a prior agreement was binding
  • “Whether [a contract is] express or implied in fact, under certain circumstances, a court may add or supply an omitted essential term.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.