Hughes v. Large

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• retroactive application of P.A. 13- 3 to petitioner who committed offenses between enact- ment of 2011 amendment to § 54-125a (b) (2
• “mere speculation or conjecture . . . will not suffice to establish a violation of the [e]x [p]ost [f]acto [c]lause” of federal constitution (internal quota- tion marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).