Skip to main content
· 10/15/1885

Hughes v. Lacock

Citations

  • 63 Miss. 112

Syllabus

<p>jEnp-oegment oe .Iudgxevt. What necessary to bind individual property of partners. Section 1736, Code of Hid,,construed.</p> <p>H. obtained judgment against the mercantile firm of J. & W. This judgment was enrolled under the letter “ J,” and the individual names of the firm were there set out also. No entry of the judgmentwas made under the letter “ W.” Held, thatunder § 1736, Code of-1880, which provides “that all final judgments shall be enrolled by entering on such judgment roll under the appropriate letter of the alphabet the names of each and every defendant,” such enrollment binds the property and creditors of and purchasers from the firm, but does not bind the individual property of W., nor give notice to creditors of or purchasers from, him individually.</p>

Judges: Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.