Skip to main content
· 9/22/1998

Hughes v. Fink, Fink and Associates

Citations

  • 718 A.2d 316
  • 1998 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the trial court’s order is a hybrid, entering a judgment of non pros and dismissing the action with prejudice, the order is final and appealable even without the filing of a petition to open or strike
  • indicating that two months of non-docketed discovery was insufficient to establish due diligence after almost four years elapsed without docket activity
  • emphasizing that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to move the case forward

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Cercone, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.