· 9/22/1998
Hughes v. Fink, Fink and Associates
Citations
- 718 A.2d 316
- 1998 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where the trial court’s order is a hybrid, entering a judgment of non pros and dismissing the action with prejudice, the order is final and appealable even without the filing of a petition to open or strike
- indicating that two months of non-docketed discovery was insufficient to establish due diligence after almost four years elapsed without docket activity
- emphasizing that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to move the case forward
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Cercone, Montemuro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.