· 1/13/1981
Hughes v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 425 A.2d 1299
- 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding in a prisoner negligence 21 case that the plaintiff must proffer expert testimony to establish the standard of care
- plaintiff “must show ... that what occurred in the case at bar was a negligent deviation from the demonstrated acceptable standard”
- plaintiff “must show ... that what occurred in the case at bar was a negligent deviation from the demonstrated acceptable standard”
- expert testimony or other evidence was required to show that prison security system was not operated with reasonable care
- expert testimony or other evidence was required to show that prison security system was not operated with reasonable care
- “The question of whether prison officials acted reasonably to secure the safety of an inmate is not one within the realm of the everyday experiences of a lay person.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacK, Ferren, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.