Skip to main content
· 1/13/1981

Hughes v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 425 A.2d 1299
  • 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding in a prisoner negligence 21 case that the plaintiff must proffer expert testimony to establish the standard of care
  • plaintiff “must show ... that what occurred in the case at bar was a negligent deviation from the demonstrated acceptable standard”
  • plaintiff “must show ... that what occurred in the case at bar was a negligent deviation from the demonstrated acceptable standard”
  • expert testimony or other evidence was required to show that prison security system was not operated with reasonable care
  • expert testimony or other evidence was required to show that prison security system was not operated with reasonable care
  • “The question of whether prison officials acted reasonably to secure the safety of an inmate is not one within the realm of the everyday experiences of a lay person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacK, Ferren, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.