Skip to main content
· 6/19/1996

Hughes v. Chater

Citations

  • 931 F. Supp. 625
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10969
  • 1996 WL 430881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Wjhere the ALJ acknowledges a claimant’s limitations and testifies as to the existence of jobs which have lower requirements than those listed in the DOT, it is not error for the ALJ to rely on such testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.