Skip to main content
· 4/15/1918

Hughes v. Carr

Citations

  • 101 Wash. 109
  • 172 P. 224
  • 1918 Wash. LEXIS 815

Syllabus

<p>Taxation—Distraint—Sale of Personal Property — “Dissipated.” Part of a stock of goods was not “dissipated or about to be dissipated,” within the meaning of Rem. Code, § 9249, authorizing a distraint for taxes, from the fact that it was removed from the storeroom and placed in a storage warehouse when the prohibition law went into effect and it could no longer be used in the business; and the county treasurer would be liable for its unlawful distraint.</p> <p>Parker, J., dissents.</p>

Judges: Main, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.