Hughes v. Carr
Citations
- 101 Wash. 109
- 172 P. 224
- 1918 Wash. LEXIS 815
Syllabus
<p>Taxation—Distraint—Sale of Personal Property — “Dissipated.” Part of a stock of goods was not “dissipated or about to be dissipated,” within the meaning of Rem. Code, § 9249, authorizing a distraint for taxes, from the fact that it was removed from the storeroom and placed in a storage warehouse when the prohibition law went into effect and it could no longer be used in the business; and the county treasurer would be liable for its unlawful distraint.</p> <p>Parker, J., dissents.</p>
Judges: Main, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.