Hughes v. Busseyville Oil & Gas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations of deceptive conduct under section 75-1.1 must be pleaded with particularity
• holding that “several of the reasons” that led the court not to apply Rule 9(b) in CBP Res.-, Inc. “either do not apply in the present case or can no longer be maintained in light of more recent developments”
• explaining that the rule’s purpose “is to satisfy the court ‘(1) that the defendant has been made aware of the particular circumstances for which she will have to prepare a defense at trial, and (2
• noting Baltimore County is unpublished and non-precedential and that “multiple courts have continued to apply a heighted pleading requirement to North Carolina negligent misrepresentation claims.”
• applying Rule 9(b) to claim under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-1.1, the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act
• applying Rule 9(b) to a section 75-1.1 claim alleging fraudulent misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).