Hughes v. Boston Scientific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims for failure to warn, premised on violation of FDA regulations, were not preempted
• holding that the plaintiff’s products liability claim challenging the adequacy of FDA-approved labeling was preempted
• holding that the plaintiff’s products liability claim challenging the adequacy of FDA-approved labeling was preempted
• holding that state tort law failure- to-warn claim was not impliedly preempted
• holding that a negligent failure to warn claim was not preempted and survived summary judgment where a device manufacturer failed to report 300 incidents of relevant device failure over a five-year period
• holding that state tort law failure-to-warn claim was not impliedly preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).