Hughes v. BCI International Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only if the defendants wrongfully obtained assets that were specifically intended for a third party, then would the unjust enrichment claim survive the motion to dismiss
• holding that only if the defendants wrongfully obtained assets that were specifically intended for a third party, then would the unjust enrichment claim survive the motion to dismiss
• addressing defendant’s challenge to personal jurisdiction and venue before the “sufficiency of plaintiffs’ substantive allegations”
• “[P]laintiffs’ written agreement with [contracting defendant] does not, as a matter of law, bar a claim for unjust enrichment against non-parties to that agreement whose alleged conduct falls outside of the subject matter of the agreement.”
• “[P]laintiffs have adequately plead [sic] a claim for constructive trust.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).