Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding signatory equitably estopped from repudiating arbitration clause in agreement on which suit against nonsignatory was based
• finding signatory equitably estopped from repudiating arbitration clause in agreement on which suit against non-signatory was based
• “Whatever the merit of [the third-party standing] argument, we believe Hughes is equitably estopped from asserting it.... ”
• “In short, [plaintiff] cannot have it both ways. [It] cannot rely on the contract when it works to its advantage, and repudiate it when it works to [its] disadvantage.”
• “ ‘In short, (plaintiff) cannot have it both ways. (It) cannot rely on the contract when it works to its advantage, and repudiate it when it works to (its) disadvantage.’”
• “ ‘In short, (plaintiff) cannot have it both ways. (It) cannot rely on the contract when it works to its advantage, and repudiate it when it works to (its) disadvantage.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).