Hughes Lumber Co. v. Knuckles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while relators were not required to plead specific false claims, in order to prove fraud based on promoting drugs for unapproved uses, relator was required to “plead for what unaccepted medical indications Aventis promoted Taxotere”
• “Viewing the pleadings in the light most favorable to Mr. Gohil, as I must, I can easily infer the existence of an agreement.” (citation omitted)
• “By pleading a ‘scheme’ to promote [the drug] for medically accepted indications,” the related counts appear “baseless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).