Hughes Anderson Bagley, Jr., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Russell Rogerson and Patsy Bozarth, Appellants/cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding due process did not require crediting Bagley’s Iowa sentence with time he served on a federal sentence that was later vacated
• holding due process did not require crediting Bagley’s lowa sentence with time he served on a federal sentence that was later vacated
• explaining that a violation of state law, without more, is not federal constitutional violation
• “[A] violation of state law, without more, does not state a claim under the federal Constitution or 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
• violation of state law, whether statutory or decisional, does not state a claim under § 1983
• allegation of state law violation—whether statutory or decisional— does not, in itself, state a claim under the U.S. Constitution or § 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).