Hugh C. Beavers v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• but court held the material in question was not a \statement\ within the meaning of the Act and that Jencks was inapplicable anyway
• but court held the material in question was not a \statement\ within the meaning of the Act and that Jencks was inapplicable anyway
• but court held the material in question was not a “statement” within the meaning of the Act and that Jencks was inapplicable anyway
• but court held the material in question was not a “statement” within the meaning of the Act and that Jencks was inapplicable anyway
• tape recording in the hands of state authorities not covered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).