Hugh C. Ardleigh v. Schlumberger Limited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employment on 30 unconnected vessels does not meet test for seaman status
• pre-Chandris: “[I]tinerant wireline workers are not Jones Act seamen” because “they usually have no permanent relationship with a particular vessel or fleet of vessels.”
• “[I]tinerant wireline workers are not Jones Act seamen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).