Huffsmith v. United States Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issues not “specifically and distinctly raised and argued” in opening briefs need not be considered by the court
• approving a procedure that permits “banding” of scores and treatment of scores within a statistically derived “band” as substantively equivalent for purposes of the examination
• judicial estoppel “preserves the integrity of the judicial system” by preventing parties from “assert[ing] a position in this proceeding inconsistent with the one they previously asserted”
• discussing physical injury in the context of CGL standard policies
• swimming pool liner with no depth markers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).