· 6/15/1988
Huffman v. Western Nuclear, Inc.
Citations
- 486 U.S. 663
- 108 S. Ct. 2087
- 100 L. Ed. 2d 693
- 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2732
- 56 U.S.L.W. 4576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating an ineffective assistance of counsel claimant must demonstrate his counsel’s performance was deficient, overcoming a strong presumption counsel’s conduct was within a wide range of reasonable professional experience
- \DOE's successful opposition of respondents' motion [for summary judgment] is insufficient to establish that it is entitled to summary judgment in its favor\
- “DOE’s successful opposition of respondents’ motion [for summary judgment] is insufficient to establish that it is entitled to summary judgment in its favor”
- to be deficient, an attorney’s performance must “[fall] below an objective standard of reasonableness.”
- “Another competitive alternative was the emergence of a secondary market in which domestic utilities, bound by long-term contracts to purchase enrichment services in excess of their needs, sold their enriched uranium to other utilities at substantial discounts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackmun
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.