Huffman v. Vaughan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• phone number referred to by trustworthy informant was investigated by Federal Drug Enforcement Agency and defendant’s neighbors noted frequent visitors at all hours
• defendant’s brief referred in terms to the State Constitution, but since the defendant failed to rely on the applicable State constitutional provision in his pre-trial motion to suppress, the issue had not been preserved for appeal
• court will not consider on appeal arguments or issues not raised below

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).