Skip to main content

Huffman v. State

Citations

  • 822 N.E.2d 656
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 219
  • 2005 WL 399607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant who pleaded guilty to a probation violation could not raise claims on direct appeal attacking the validity of the plea and dismissing without prejudice as to her right to raise these issues in a subsequent post-conviction proceeding
  • applying Tumulty to defendant who pleaded guilty to probation violation then attacked validity of her plea on direct appeal
  • relying on Post-Conviction Rule 1(1)(a)(5)
  • applying Tumulty to probation revocations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Crone, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.