Huffman v. Sisk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a taxpayer’s injuries are “common to all citizens and taxpayers ,.. [which thereby] defeats the constitutional requirement of a concrete and particularized injury”
• recognizing that a taxpayer's injuries are \common to all citizens and taxpayers ... [which thereby] defeats the constitutional requirement of a concrete and particularized injury\
• finding that the appellant's request for monetary damages for himself in addition to his requests for various declaratory judgments, while claiming to represent the taxpayers of his county, directly conflicted with the purpose and spirit of the public importance exception
• “Standing may be acquired: (1) through the rubric of ‘constitutional standing’; (2) under the ‘public importance’ exception; or (3) by statute.”
• stating there is a nexus between the public importance exception and the need for future guidance from the courts is \invariably linked to a need for and entitlement to injunctive relief\
• “The traditional concepts of constitutional standing are inapplicable when standing is conferred by statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).