Skip to main content
· 6/18/1956

Huffman v. Kite

Citations

  • 198 Va. 196
  • 93 S.E.2d 328
  • 1956 Va. LEXIS 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering appeal in a declaratory judgment action concerning a dispute over who was the proper office holder
  • distinguishing language that is “mandatory” from language that is “merely advisory, and thus only directory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eggleston, Buchanan, Miller, Smith, Whittle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.